2020

• Jul 22^nd Call for village to consider self-build housing 0 comments
• Jul 20^th Developer tries yet again to build on Debenham land 0 comments
• Jul 1^st Taylor Wimpey folds up its tents and steals away 0 comments
• May 23^rd June Parish Magazine 0 comments
• Apr 30^th Rights of way project 2 comments
• May 20^th How the Paths Project works 0 comments
• May 28^th See where people are walking 0 comments
• May 3^rd Debenham tithe map 0 comments
• May 19^th Mickfield Meadow circular walk 0 comments
• May 5^th New details of Low Road homes plan 0 comments
• May 6^th How Debenham land helped the poor in 16th century plagues 0 comments
• May 4^th Birdsong for a walk along the Deben 0 comments
• Apr 20^th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan shortlisted with big city schemes for national planning award 0 comments
• May 1^st Why the new site 0 comments
• Apr 30^th Footpaths map 2 comments
• Feb 1^st Whitewash! Debenham 439 — Taylor Wimpey 0 0 comments
• Jan 21^st 228 comments on TW plan so far but more needed to match objections last time 0 comments
• Jan 7^th Standing room only at Parish Council meeting as TW renewed application condemned 0 comments
• Jan 3^rd Emergency Parish Council meeting on Monday, Jan 6, to consider TW’s renewed application 0 comments

2019

• Dec 18^th Why were planning officials trying to rush scrutiny of TW plan? 0 comments
• Dec 17^th Taylor Wimpey gets a “free go” to renew its threat to Debenham 0 comments

2018

• Dec 19^th Taylor Wimpy 295 homes plan rejected by Mid Suffolk council 0 comments
• Dec 19^th The moment the Taylor Wimpey’s Debenham plans were voted down 0 comments
• Dec 15^th Documents reveal planners encouraged Taylor Wimpey to enlarge Debenham plan 0 comments
• Dec 14^th Mid Suffolk planners disagree on Debenham housing 0 comments
• Oct 30^th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan: ‘clear vision’ for the future, says inspector 0 comments
• Jul 26^th MP Dan Poulter supports campaign against Taylor Wimpey houses 0 comments
• Jul 5^th Dr Dan ducks chance to support villages fighting predatory developers 0 comments
• Jun 25^th Council charges for planning advice lead to ‘presumption of delivery’ of approval 0 comments
• Jun 15^th Move to new offices and stress add to problems of Mid Suffolk planners 0 comments
• Jun 13^th Independent review endorses Parish Council view on house building 0 comments
• Apr 7^th Council refuses to reveal extent of meetings with housing developer 0 comments
• Mar 20^th Overwhelming support for Neighbourhood Plan 0 comments
• Mar 4^th Javid threatens to take-over planning from councils not delivering enough housing 0 comments
• Mar 4^th An open letter to Dan Poulter MP about planning and Debenham 0 comments
• Mar 2^nd Mid Suffolk council’s ‘colossal failings’ give developers carte blanche 0 comments
• Feb 28^th Taylor Wimpey profits hit by costs of dealing with leasehold scandal 0 comments
• Feb 27^th Persimmon profits last year near to £1 billion 0 comments
• Feb 26^th Raiders grab ATM from Debenham Co-op 0 comments
• Feb 24^th Housing company boss agrees to cut his bonus by £25m — to £75 million 1 comment
• Feb 23^rd ‘Tilted balance’ defeats three councils and residents opposition to housing development 0 comments
• Feb 21^st How lobbying by housing industry has thwarted ambition to ‘put power in the hands of local people’ 0 comments
• Feb 21^st New by-pass for Long Stratton linked to plan for new housing 0 comments
• Feb 19^th Tweet of the day 0 comments
• Feb 19^th Small Suffolk villages as well as larger communities face onslaught of housing developers 0 comments
• Feb 19^th Big builders lobbied for loophole in planning regs to overcome local wishes 0 comments
• Feb 14^th TW seeks to limit climate change measures 0 comments
• Feb 13^th Framlingham council refuses to discuss plans with developers 0 comments
• Feb 11^th 640 new houses in Debenham – Taylor Wimpey’s real vision uncovered 0 comments
• Feb 9^th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan needs your support 0 comments
• Feb 7^th Three quarters of village’s historic buildings missing from TW application 0 comments
• Feb 5^th Size of Taylor Wimpey site increased while talks with planners took place 0 comments
• Feb 5^th More about counting comments on planning application 0 comments
• Feb 4^th Long Melford fights predatory developers 0 comments
• Feb 2^nd ‘District councillors can say what they think of a planning application and take part in decision making’ 0 comments
• Feb 2^nd Number of public comments on Taylor Wimpey application unclear 0 comments
• Jan 31^st Taylor Wimpey boss defends house builders’ failure to use planning consents 0 comments
• Jan 31^st Dan Poulter speaks out about developers exploiting loopholes in planning rules 0 comments
• Jan 29^th Even if you avoid reading long reports you really, really must look at the Debenham Neighbourhood Plan 0 comments
• Jan 28^th Half of houses with planning permission are not built 0 comments
• Jan 26^th Slipshod page undermines planning application credibility 0 comments
• Jan 26^th Somerset town defeats Taylor Wimpey development 0 comments
• Jan 26^th Newspaper report on village ‘under siege’ 0 comments
• Jan 25^th ‘Archaeologists should dig before planning decision is made’ 0 comments
• Jan 24^th A village prepares to fight the big builder 0 comments