2020
- Jul 22nd Call for village to consider self-build housing 0 comments
- Jul 20th Developer tries yet again to build on Debenham land 0 comments
- Jul 1st Taylor Wimpey folds up its tents and steals away 0 comments
- May 23rd June Parish Magazine 0 comments
- Apr 30th Rights of way project 2 comments
- May 20th How the Paths Project works 0 comments
- May 28th See where people are walking 0 comments
- May 3rd Debenham tithe map 0 comments
- May 19th Mickfield Meadow circular walk 0 comments
- May 5th New details of Low Road homes plan 0 comments
- May 6th How Debenham land helped the poor in 16th century plagues 0 comments
- May 4th Birdsong for a walk along the Deben 0 comments
- Apr 20th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan shortlisted with big city schemes for national planning award 0 comments
- May 1st Why the new site 0 comments
- Apr 30th Footpaths map 2 comments
- Feb 1st Whitewash! Debenham 439 — Taylor Wimpey 0 0 comments
- Jan 21st 228 comments on TW plan so far but more needed to match objections last time 0 comments
- Jan 7th Standing room only at Parish Council meeting as TW renewed application condemned 0 comments
- Jan 3rd Emergency Parish Council meeting on Monday, Jan 6, to consider TW’s renewed application 0 comments
2019
- Dec 18th Why were planning officials trying to rush scrutiny of TW plan? 0 comments
- Dec 17th Taylor Wimpey gets a “free go” to renew its threat to Debenham 0 comments
2018
- Dec 19th Taylor Wimpy 295 homes plan rejected by Mid Suffolk council 0 comments
- Dec 19th The moment the Taylor Wimpey’s Debenham plans were voted down 0 comments
- Dec 15th Documents reveal planners encouraged Taylor Wimpey to enlarge Debenham plan 0 comments
- Dec 14th Mid Suffolk planners disagree on Debenham housing 0 comments
- Oct 30th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan: ‘clear vision’ for the future, says inspector 0 comments
- Jul 26th MP Dan Poulter supports campaign against Taylor Wimpey houses 0 comments
- Jul 5th Dr Dan ducks chance to support villages fighting predatory developers 0 comments
- Jun 25th Council charges for planning advice lead to ‘presumption of delivery’ of approval 0 comments
- Jun 15th Move to new offices and stress add to problems of Mid Suffolk planners 0 comments
- Jun 13th Independent review endorses Parish Council view on house building 0 comments
- Apr 7th Council refuses to reveal extent of meetings with housing developer 0 comments
- Mar 20th Overwhelming support for Neighbourhood Plan 0 comments
- Mar 4th Javid threatens to take-over planning from councils not delivering enough housing 0 comments
- Mar 4th An open letter to Dan Poulter MP about planning and Debenham 0 comments
- Mar 2nd Mid Suffolk council’s ‘colossal failings’ give developers carte blanche 0 comments
- Feb 28th Taylor Wimpey profits hit by costs of dealing with leasehold scandal 0 comments
- Feb 27th Persimmon profits last year near to £1 billion 0 comments
- Feb 26th Raiders grab ATM from Debenham Co-op 0 comments
- Feb 24th Housing company boss agrees to cut his bonus by £25m — to £75 million 1 comment
- Feb 23rd ‘Tilted balance’ defeats three councils and residents opposition to housing development 0 comments
- Feb 21st How lobbying by housing industry has thwarted ambition to ‘put power in the hands of local people’ 0 comments
- Feb 21st New by-pass for Long Stratton linked to plan for new housing 0 comments
- Feb 19th Tweet of the day 0 comments
- Feb 19th Small Suffolk villages as well as larger communities face onslaught of housing developers 0 comments
- Feb 19th Big builders lobbied for loophole in planning regs to overcome local wishes 0 comments
- Feb 14th TW seeks to limit climate change measures 0 comments
- Feb 13th Framlingham council refuses to discuss plans with developers 0 comments
- Feb 11th 640 new houses in Debenham – Taylor Wimpey’s real vision uncovered 0 comments
- Feb 9th Debenham Neighbourhood Plan needs your support 0 comments
- Feb 7th Three quarters of village’s historic buildings missing from TW application 0 comments
- Feb 5th Size of Taylor Wimpey site increased while talks with planners took place 0 comments
- Feb 5th More about counting comments on planning application 0 comments
- Feb 4th Long Melford fights predatory developers 0 comments
- Feb 2nd ‘District councillors can say what they think of a planning application and take part in decision making’ 0 comments
- Feb 2nd Number of public comments on Taylor Wimpey application unclear 0 comments
- Jan 31st Taylor Wimpey boss defends house builders’ failure to use planning consents 0 comments
- Jan 31st Dan Poulter speaks out about developers exploiting loopholes in planning rules 0 comments
- Jan 29th Even if you avoid reading long reports you really, really must look at the Debenham Neighbourhood Plan 0 comments
- Jan 28th Half of houses with planning permission are not built 0 comments
- Jan 26th Slipshod page undermines planning application credibility 0 comments
- Jan 26th Somerset town defeats Taylor Wimpey development 0 comments
- Jan 26th Newspaper report on village ‘under siege’ 0 comments
- Jan 25th ‘Archaeologists should dig before planning decision is made’ 0 comments
- Jan 24th A village prepares to fight the big builder 0 comments